The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Identify issues by research and consultation
|
|
Aim and objectives for the development of context are identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Stakeholders' roles and inputs required are determined in accordance with policies and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Budget, timeframe and schedule for research and consultation are determined Completed |
Evidence:
|
Community information is obtained Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify and liaise with stakeholders
|
|
Existing and potential liaison networks are identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Relevance of existing and potential networks is evaluated Completed |
Evidence:
|
New networks are developed using a range of strategies Completed |
Evidence:
|
Liaison and communication structures are established Completed |
Evidence:
|
Clarify stakeholders' roles and requirements
|
|
Stakeholders' roles and the need for their input are clearly defined and emphasised in seeking their cooperation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Stakeholders are informed of aims, objectives and the risk management context and structure within which they must operate Completed |
Evidence:
|
Needs of stakeholders are determined and conflicting needs identified and noted Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop risk evaluation criteria with stakeholders
|
|
Social, environmental, financial and timeframe needs are identified in consultation with stakeholders Completed |
Evidence:
|
Legal, technical and political considerations are identified in consultation with stakeholders Completed |
Evidence:
|
Reasons for, and selection of, criteria are negotiated with stakeholders and agreed upon Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluation criteria are recommended which take into account practical constraints and the community's acceptance of risk Completed |
Evidence:
|
Community expectations of acceptable risk are established Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor and review
|
|
Context and Evaluation Criteria are monitored in accordance with standards and guidelines Completed |
Evidence:
|
Context and Evaluation Criteria are reviewed in accordance with standards and guidelines Completed |
Evidence:
|